[Global “Agri-Talk”] More Than One Robot: The Power of European-Style Cooperative Agricultural Technology (AgTech)

Approved 2026.07.30 09:00Updated 2026.07.30 13:49

[Global “Agri-Talk”: Capturing the Future of Agriculture] Kim Gi-cheol, Head of the Europe Office of the Jeonnam-Gwangju Integrated Special City

김기철 편집.jpg

At Europe’s agricultural expos, cutting-edge equipment immediately catches the eyeRobots that remove weeds on their ownequipment that counts blossoms and fruit on orchard trees to vary fertilizer applicationand even AI systems that adjust feed amounts for each individual animalBut the distance from the exhibition hall to the farm is farther than one might thinkThese machines are expensive and used only for short periodsthere may be no one available to repair them when they break downand in many cases their data does not connect with existing equipmentThat is why in Europe, organizations that enable machines to be used together are considered just as important as advanced farm machinery itself.

Organizations for sharing machinery, CUMA
A representative example is France’s cooperative for the shared use of agricultural machinery, 'CUMA'. As of 2025, there are more than 9,200 of them across Francewith 182,000 farmers participatingThat is nearly half of all French farmersMembers jointly purchase not only tractors and harvesters, but also expensive facilities such as precision seedersmechanical weedersand composting facilities. More than 1,400 cooperatives directly employ staff as well, handling drivingmaintenancework scheduling, and even technical training together.

The first advantage of shared use is costInstead of one farm tying up a large amount of money in equipment used for only a few daysmultiple farms fill the usage time and lower fixed costsIts greater strength lies in technology selectionBy pooling demand from multiple farms, a cooperative can test new equipment and hire specialistsOnce performance is verified, the technology is spread through joint trainingIn other words, even the risks of adopting technology are shared.

Germany’s 'Maschinenring' began from the same philosophy. In 1958, family farms that found it difficult to purchase expensive agricultural machinery on their own started by linking each other’s machines and laborToday, 230 regional organizations connect 178,000 farmsand the farmland they connect amounts to about 40% of Germany’s farmlandThis organization identifies which farms or contractors have what equipment and operating capabilities, connects them with farms in needand also provides support for busy-season operations and settlementas well as training and management assistance.

From metal to data
Recently, the scope of shared use has been expanding from machinery to softwareThe digital service 'MeinAcker' operated by Germany’s Maschinenring handles plot-by-plot farming logs, fertilizer prescriptionsfarm work requests and settlementsand supporting documents all in one placeRegional organizations do not simply distribute the app; they help with initial setup and trainingand staff who understand both agriculture and regulations solve problemsWhat digital agriculture needs is not another screen, but a trustworthy helper nearby.

The Netherlands’ nonprofit cooperative 'JoinData' goes a step furtherFarm data flowing to milking robotsfeed companiesaccountantsand government agencies can be viewed by farmers on a single screenand they can directly approve or withdraw who may use it, for what purpose, and for how longAs agricultural technology(AgTech) spreads, control over data determines farm competitivenessIf changing equipment means past data can no longer be used, or management information is utilized without the farmer even knowingtechnology can become not an asset but a form of dependency.

Shared use does not succeed on its own
Of course, shared use does not succeed automaticallyWhen sowing and harvest are concentrated on the same day, it must be decided in advance who gets priorityhow travel·cleaning·charging time will be calculatedand who will bear responsibility for breakdowns and accidentsUsage fees by hour or by arearules for changing reservationsoperator qualifications and insuranceand data ownership must also be clearA good cooperative is not a gathering that relies on personal ties, but a management organization equipped with rules and professional personnel before conflicts arise.

From a rental business to a service
Korea already has 447 agricultural machinery rental centers and experience with farm work outsourcing through the National Agricultural Cooperative FederationThe direction we now need to move toward can be summarized in one sentence. 'from a business that rents out machines' to 'a service that provides work results'. It is not enough to place one autonomous weeding robot in a villageFarms with similar crops and work schedules must be grouped togetherskilled operators must be trainedand transport·maintenance·insurance·reservation·settlement must be turned into a single serviceInstead of a robot, farmers should be able to purchase outcomes such as 'weeding 1 hectare of field' or 'precision spraying for an orchard'.

The evaluation criteria for government support must also move beyond the number of units distributedEquipment utilization rateswork cost per areadowntime due to breakdownslabor hours savedreductions in pesticide·fertilizer use, and farmers’ control over their data should be treated as performance indicatorsIf local agricultural cooperatives and farming associations are supported in comparatively testing equipment from multiple manufacturers and creating shared data ruleseven small-scale farms will be able to use the most advanced technology.

The core of European-style cooperative agricultural technology(AgTech) is not that every farm owns a robotIt lies in using good technology at the right timesolving breakdowns togetherand protecting the rights to the data generated in the processThe smallest unit that changes the future of agriculture may not be a single machinebut an organization of farmers that enables machines to be used properly.

This article has been automatically translated by AI (Artificial Intelligence).

Related Articles

[Baek Cheol-hyeon’s Focus] AFPRO 2026 Missing the ‘Substance’… It Must Create a Stage for ‘Real Business,’ Not Just for Show[Baek Cheol-hyeon’s Focus] AFPRO 2026 Missing the ‘Substance’… It Must Create a Stage for ‘Real Business,’ Not Just for Show2026.07.29[Seo Jong-hyo Column] From Digging Up Sweet Potatoes to Tissue Culture[Seo Jong-hyo Column] From Digging Up Sweet Potatoes to Tissue Culture2026.07.28[Lee Hyun-woo’s Crooked Line] Big corporations that abandoned the promise of a 1 trillion won coexistence fund… Answer with ‘true coexistence’[Lee Hyun-woo’s Crooked Line] Big corporations that abandoned the promise of a 1 trillion won coexistence fund… Answer with ‘true coexistence’2026.07.27[Global “Ag Talk”] Why Did U.S. Agriculture Choose Robots?[Global “Ag Talk”] Why Did U.S. Agriculture Choose Robots?2026.07.22[Kim Hyeong-seok Column] The Era of Crop Cultivation Management Robots Is Coming[Kim Hyeong-seok Column] The Era of Crop Cultivation Management Robots Is Coming2026.07.21[Global “Agri-Talk”] Why Does Europe Develop Agricultural Robots Together with Farmers?[Global “Agri-Talk”] Why Does Europe Develop Agricultural Robots Together with Farmers?2026.07.15